International Journal of Cardiology

BACKGROUND The optimal antiplatelet regimen in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and multivessel disease undergoing drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty remains unclear. METHODS This was a prespecified subgroup analysis of the REC-CAGEFREE II trial, which was conducted at 41 sites in China and randomized 1948 exclusively DCB-treated participants with ACS to stepwise dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) de-escalation or standard DAPT. The primary endpoint was net adverse clinical events (NACE; including all-cause death, stroke, myocardial infarction, revascularization, and BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding) at 12 months. Participants were stratified into multivessel and single-vessel subgroups according to angiographic characteristics. RESULTS Overall, 720/1948 (37.0%) patients had multivessel disease. The multivessel subgroup was associated with a significantly higher risk of NACE compared with the single-vessel subgroup (12.5% versus 6.7%, HR IPTW:1.84, 95%CI:1.35-2.51, P<0.001). No significant interaction was observed between vessel status (multivessel or single-vessel) and treatment allocation with respect to NACE (Pinteraction=0.542). In the multivessel subgroup, NACE occurred in 44/368 (12.1%) and 45/352 (12.9%) in the stepwise de-escalation and standard DAPT groups (HR IPTW:0.95, 95%CI:0.62-1.75, P=0.818), respectively. In the single-vessel subgroup, NACE occurred in 43/607 (7.1%) and 39/621 (6.3%) in the stepwise de-escalation and standard groups (HR IPTW:1.12, 95%CI:0.72-1.70, P=0.611), respectively. For the prespecified hierarchical secondary endpoint, win ratio analyses yielded more wins for stepwise de-escalation in both subgroups. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with ACS undergoing DCB-only angioplasty, those with multivessel disease were associated with a higher risk of NACE than those with single-vessel disease. Stepwise DAPT de-escalation and standard DAPT exhibited similar risk-benefit profiles in both subgroups.

Background: Adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients are prone to HLA-antibody formation from multiple surgeries, transfusions, and prosthetic surgical material. Females with ACHD may accrue additional, non-surgical alloantigen exposure. Whether sex modifies the impact of allosensitization on heart transplant (HT) access and outcomes in ACHD remains unknown. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the OPTN/UNOS registry of adults with ACHD listed for first-time HT (2018-2025). Sensitization was defined by calculated panel reactive antibodies (cPRA) at listing. We tested the sex x sensitization (highly sensitized, cPRA >50%) interaction on transplant access using Fine-Gray competing-risks regression, treating transplantation as the event of interest and death or removal from the waitlist as competing events, and on post-transplant survival using multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression, both adjusted for age at listing, mechanical support at listing, and the number of distinct prior cardiac surgery categories. Results: Among 856 candidates (38% female), females were more often highly sensitized than males (23% vs 14%; age-adjusted OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.26-2.61), even after adjusting for surgical burden. Sensitization reduced transplant access in females (84% to 71%; median wait 60 to 110 days, p < 0.001) but not males (79% vs 79%, median wait 88 vs 98 days). In adjusted Fine-Gray models, the subdistribution hazard for transplant was reduced in sensitized females (sHR 0.54, 95% CI 0.41-0.72) with no effect in males (sHR 0.96, 95% CI 0.73-1.26), and the sex x sensitization interaction was significant (interaction sHR 0.64, 95% CI 0.44-0.94, p = 0.02). Post-transplant mortality was numerically higher in sensitized than non-sensitized candidates in both sexes and the sex x sensitization interaction on 1-year mortality was not significant. The sex-asymmetric effect persisted and was more pronounced in the multiorgan candidates. Conclusions: Allosensitization is not a sex-neutral barrier to transplant in HT candidates with ACHD. Females are more sensitized and have reduced transplant access without differences in 1-year mortality. The female excess in sensitization is not accounted for by surgical burden, and the exposures responsible remain to be defined. These findings warrant a sex-aware listing strategy and further studies.

Background Hospitalizations and mortality due to heart failure (HF) are rising in rural areas. However, inpatient outcomes for young adults with HF are not well understood. We aimed to compare in-hospital mortality, advanced procedure utilization, length of stay, and total charges among rural and urban HF patients ages 18-45. Methods We analyzed hospitalizations from the National Inpatient Sample (2016-2022), categorizing discharges as rural (National Center for Health Statistics [NCHS] 5-6), small and medium metropolitan (NCHS 3-4), and urban (NCHS 1-2). Generalized estimating equations were used to model outcomes and adjust for demographics, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics. Outcomes are reported as adjusted rate (aIRRs) or risk ratios (aRRs) with 95% confidence intervals. Results Among 79,258 HF hospitalizations among young adults, 45,075 and 10,722 were for patients from urban and rural areas, respectively. Rural patients had higher rates of in-hospital mortality (1.6% vs. 1.2%; aIRR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.05, 1.56, p = 0.043), advanced cardiac procedure utilization (15.0% vs. 14.8%; aIRR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.11, 1.28, p < 0.001), and longer hospital stays (aIRR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.05, 1.14, p = 0.003). Small and medium metropolitan residents had similar outcomes to urban residents. In interaction analyses, the association between rural-urban residence and mortality differed by race (pint = 0.003) and payer type (pint < 0.001). Conclusions Young adults in rural areas may be prone to poor outcomes following hospitalization for HF. Strategies to identify rural adults at risk for HF and provide affordable and timely care may improve disparities.

Background: Adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) represent a rapidly expanding population with evolving mortality patterns. Despite improved survival, excess mortality persists. Objective: To evaluate the incidence, causes, and predictors of mortality in a contemporary ACHD cohort. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of adults (?18 years) first evaluated at Mayo Clinic from 2002?2023. Baseline clinical, imaging, and electrocardiographic data were analyzed. Vital status was determined using institutional records and the Accurint national mortality database. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate mortality and identify independent predictors of mortality Results: A total of 7,678 ACHD patients were included, with median age of 36.8 years and median follow-up of 11.4 years. During 78,768 patient-years of follow-up, 1,116 patients died (median age at death 57.2 years), corresponding to an annual mortality rate of 1.4%. The cumulative rate of all-cause mortality at 5, 10, 15, and 20 years was 6.9%, 12.0%, 19.0%, and 26.2%, respectively. When stratified by CHD complexity, the annual death rate in patients with severe CHD (2.4%/year) was twice that of patients with moderate or mild CHD (both 1.2%/year). Older age and ACHD subtypes, specifically, cyanotic heart disease (HR 3.9, 95% CI 2.9?5.3) and Fontan physiology (HR 3.2, 95% CI 2.3?4.4), were strongly associated with increased mortality. Additional independent predictors included male sex, ventricular dysfunction, advanced NYHA class, prior heart failure hospitalization, hypertension, smoking, coronary artery disease, renal dysfunction, and abnormal hemoglobin levels. Cardiovascular causes accounted for 57.7% of deaths with known etiology, predominantly heart failure (48.9%) and sudden cardiac death (21.9%), while non-cardiovascular causes were driven mainly by infection and malignancy. Conclusions: In this large contemporary ACHD cohort, mortality was driven by ventricular dysfunction, heart failure, and systemic end-organ involvement in addition to the underlying congenital anatomy. Both cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular causes contributed significantly to mortality. These findings underscore the need for comprehensive multidisciplinary ACHD care focused on early recognition of cardiac functional decline, management of acquired comorbidities, and end-organ dysfunction.

Background: Percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (pMCS) is increasingly used in critically ill patients, yet its value in relation to cost and outcomes remains unclear. We evaluated national variation in utilization, outcomes, and cost, and introduced a value of care framework integrating risk-adjusted outcomes and expenditures. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample to identify non-elective hospitalizations of critically ill patients undergoing intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or percutaneous left ventricular assist device (pLVAD) placement using ICD-10 codes. Multivariable logistic regression and generalized linear models were used to estimate expected outcomes and costs. Observed-to-expected (O/E) ratios were calculated, and a value index was derived to compare procedural strategies. Results: A total of 57,910 weighted hospitalizations were included (IABP 78%, pLVAD 22%). In-hospital mortality exceeded 30% across regions. Significant regional variation was observed, with the West demonstrating the highest costs and the Midwest the lowest (p<0.001). Mean hospital charges were higher for pLVAD compared with IABP ($403,731 vs $320,769). Both strategies achieved outcomes better than expected after risk adjustment (O/E 0.92); however, costs were higher than expected for both, with greater relative cost inflation observed for IABP (O/E 1.41) and higher absolute costs for pLVAD. In value-of-care analysis, IABP was associated with lower cost and comparable outcomes, while pLVAD demonstrated higher cost without proportional outcome improvement. Conclusion: Substantial variation exists in the cost, outcomes, and value of pMCS strategies. While both IABP and pLVAD achieve favorable risk-adjusted outcomes, pLVAD is associated with higher costs without commensurate clinical benefit.

Background: Sex-related disparities in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) recognition and management remain a global health concern. We examined sex-based differences in clinical presentation, management, and outcomes among patients with chest pain attended by emergency medical services (EMS) across Brazil. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study using a registry from 14 Brazilian states between January 2020 and June 2024 within a private hospital network. Patients with chest pain were classified by cardiologists as unstable angina (UA), ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Multivariable regression evaluated sex differences in diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes. Sensitivity analyses included state-clustered standard errors and E-values for unmeasured confounding. Results: Among 7,171 patients with confirmed ACS (68.2% male), median age was 63.0 years [IQR 20.0]; women were older than men (67.0 [20.0] vs 61.0 [19.0] years). Diagnoses were UA in 46.7%, STEMI in 18.8%, and NSTEMI in 34.6%. Overall, 91.7% received aspirin and 89.6% at least one additional antiplatelet agent. After adjustment, women had higher odds of chest pain classified as probably or possibly ischemic versus definitely ischemic (adjusted OR 1.51 [95% CI 1.33-1.72] and 1.60 [1.37-1.86], respectively) and lower odds of STEMI and NSTEMI relative to UA (adjusted OR 0.59 [0.51-0.68] and 0.74 [0.66-0.83], respectively). Door-to-ECG time was longer in women unadjusted ({beta}=1.53 minutes [0.24-2.82]) but not after adjustment ({beta}=1.04 [-0.27 to 2.36]). In-hospital mortality did not differ between sexes, with no evidence of excess short-term mortality in women. Conclusions: Within a private hospital network in Brazil, women with confirmed ACS were more often classified with less definitely ischemic chest pain and less frequently with STEMI or NSTEMI than men. Door-to-ECG differences did not persist after adjustment, and mortality did not differ by sex. These findings support sex-sensitive triage and diagnostic protocols to reduce inequities in ACS recognition and treatment.

Background: Ticagrelor and prasugrel are recommended P2Y12 inhibitors for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), yet uncertainty persists regarding their direct comparative evidence and guideline recommendations differ. Methods: We conducted a multinational retrospective new-user cohort study across 7 claims and electronic health record databases. Adults with ACS undergoing first PCI who initiated ticagrelor or prasugrel were included; patients with prior major ischemic or hemorrhagic events or oral anticoagulant use were excluded. The primary outcome was 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: all-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction, or stroke). Secondary outcomes included net adverse clinical events (NACE) and individual components. Propensity scores were estimated using large-scale L1-regularized logistic regression and applied through stratification. Prespecified diagnostics (covariate balance, empirical equipoise, and systematic error) determined eligibility of each database for inclusion in meta-analysis. Database-specific hazard ratios (HRs) were combined using Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis. Results: Among 7 participating databases, 3 met prespecified diagnostic criteria and were included in the primary meta-analysis, comprising 133,718 patients from one nationwide Korean claims database and two U.S. commercial claims databases (ticagrelor, 109,639; prasugrel, 24,079). For 1-year MACE, the pooled HR for ticagrelor versus prasugrel was 1.28 (95% credible interval [CrI], 0.89-1.88), with substantial between-database heterogeneity. Sensitivity analyses across alternative time-at-risk definitions and propensity score matching were consistent. No statistically credible differences were observed for NACE (HR 1.23, CrI 0.88-1.75), all-cause mortality (HR 1.17, CrI 0.78-1.77), cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.23, CrI 0.81-1.87), ischemic events (HR 1.28, CrI 0.88-1.90), hemorrhagic events (HR 1.01, CrI 0.72-1.39), acute myocardial infarction (HR 1.30, CrI 0.88-1.94), stroke (HR 1.09, CrI 0.73-1.58), or gastrointestinal bleeding (HR 1.04, CrI 0.77-1.41). In a post hoc meta-analysis restricted to the two U.S. databases, the pooled HR for 1-year MACE was 1.49 (95% CrI 1.05-2.10). Conclusions: In this pre-specified multinational observational study, no statistically credible difference in 1-year MACE was observed between ticagrelor and prasugrel in patients with ACS undergoing PCI. However, substantial cross-database heterogeneity warrants further investigation into context-specific comparative effectiveness and safety.

Background As transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) expands to younger patients with longer life expectancy, understanding long-term reintervention and clinically significant valve failure has become increasingly important. Objectives To evaluate temporal trends in TAVR outcomes, characterize the incidence and timing of aortic valve reintervention, compare outcomes after redo-TAVR (TAVR-in-TAVR) versus surgical explantation, and assess freedom from clinically significant valve failure requiring repeat intervention after TAVR versus surgical bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study using the Epic Cosmos. Adults undergoing index TAVR between February 2010 and May 2026 were identified. Primary outcomes included aortic valve reintervention and 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Reintervention incidence was estimated using competing-risk methods with death as the competing event. Propensity-score matching compared redo-TAVR with surgical explantation and TAVR with SAVR. A prespecified 1-year landmark analysis evaluated clinically significant valve failure requiring repeat intervention. Results Among 300,927 patients undergoing TAVR, annual procedural volume increased more than tenfold between 2016 and 2025. Thirty-day MACE decreased from 31.8% before 2017 to 18.6% after 2022 (P<0.001), while mortality declined from 3.0% to 1.4% (P<0.001). During follow-up, 3,315 patients underwent redo-TAVR and 347 underwent surgical explantation. The cumulative incidence of reintervention was 1.1%, 1.2%, 1.5%, and 2.7% at 3, 5, 7, and 10 years, respectively, with significantly lower rates in contemporary procedural eras (Gray test, P<0.001). Compared with surgical explantation, redo-TAVR was associated with lower 30-day mortality, stroke, acute kidney injury, and major bleeding. However, among propensity-matched hospital survivors, surgical explantation was associated with superior long-term survival (hazard ratio: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.44 - 0.93; P=0.018). In the landmark analysis, clinically significant valve failure requiring repeat intervention occurred earlier after TAVR than after SAVR despite a lower overall cumulative incidence of repeat intervention following TAVR. Conclusions Contemporary TAVR is associated with progressively improving procedural outcomes and a low incidence of repeat aortic valve intervention. Redo-TAVR offers lower perioperative risk than surgical explantation, whereas surgical explantation is associated with superior long-term survival among selected patients. Earlier clinically significant valve failure requiring repeat intervention after TAVR underscores the importance of lifetime management strategies as TAVR expands to younger populations.

Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a frequent complication following cardiac surgery and has been associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events. However, cardiac surgical populations are heterogeneous, and the long-term thromboembolic implications of POAF may differ according to the index surgical procedure. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the procedure-specific association between POAF and long-term thromboembolic outcomes after adult cardiac surgery, with particular emphasis on coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and isolated valve surgery. PubMed and Scopus were searched from database inception through August 3, 2026. Studies reporting long-term thromboembolic outcomes in patients with new-onset POAF compared with patients without POAF were evaluated, with eligible evidence classified according to the index surgical procedure. Four observational studies were included in the primary quantitative synthesis, with two studies contributing to the CABG analysis and two to the isolated valve-surgery analysis. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were pooled separately by procedure using inverse-variance methods, and a formal between-subgroup interaction test was performed. Following CABG, POAF was associated with an increased long-term thromboembolic hazard (pooled HR 1.147, 95% CI 1.053-1.249; I^2=0%). A stronger association was observed following isolated valve surgery (pooled HR 1.362, 95% CI 1.181-1.573; I^2=0%). The between-subgroup interaction was statistically significant ({chi}^2=4.10, P=0.043), providing exploratory evidence that the magnitude of the association may differ according to surgical procedure. These findings suggest that the long-term thromboembolic implications of POAF may not be uniform across cardiac surgical populations. However, because only two studies contributed to each procedure subgroup and the available evidence was observational, the interaction should be considered hypothesis-generating. Further adequately powered studies with standardized outcome definitions and procedure-specific reporting are required to confirm these findings and determine their implications for long-term risk stratification and anticoagulation strategies.

We present our Stage-1 Registered Report as a full clinical trial article with all methods in past tense and including mock results, table and figures for the primary analysis. To remind the reader that this Stage-1 article is written before data collection, we highlight in color that these mock results are only for illustrative purposes and will be replaced by the actual results in the Stage-2 Registered Report. Background In patients experiencing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, optimization of oxygen delivery during cardiopulmonary resuscitation is a critical. Although both positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP) are employed during CPR, their respective impacts on clinically relevant outcomes is yet to be clearly established. Methods This investigator-initiated, pragmatic, registry-based, multicenter, triple-blind randomized controlled superiority trial evaluates whether applying 8 cm H2O PEEP during cardiopulmonary resuscitation improves outcomes compared with ZEEP in adults with non-traumatic, non-drowning out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Pre-randomized CPR kits (1:1 PEEP vs. sham) were used by ambulance sites during manual ventilation throughout the resuscitation process. The primary analysis was conducted in the principal stratum of patients who received either a supraglottic airway or endotracheal tube. The primary outcome was neurological status at hospital discharge measured by a utility-weighted score on the modified Rankin Scale. Secondary outcomes included prehospital return of spontaneous circulation, 30-day survival, and 6-month quality of life. The primary safety outcome was clinically significant pneumothorax.

Background: Obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM) causes substantial symptom burden and impaired functional capacity. Mavacamten has emerged as a targeted pharmacologic treatment, whereas alcohol septal ablation (ASA) is an established septal reduction therapy (SRT). Direct comparative real-world data remain limited. Methods: In this propensity-controlled observational study, longitudinal registry data from Heidelberg University Hospital were analyzed. Consecutive adults with oHCM, NYHA class ?II symptoms, and a maximum LVOT gradient ?50 mmHg treated with mavacamten or ASA were included. The cohort comprised 107 ASA- and 113 mavacamten-treated patients. Follow-up was performed at 6 and 12 months. The primary endpoint was a composite adverse clinical outcome including cardiovascular death, heart failure hospitalization, SRT, heart transplantation, ventricular assist device implantation, permanent pacemaker implantation for third-degree atrioventricular block, or decline in left ventricular ejection fraction to <40%. Results: Both treatments showed significant improvement in NYHA class and LVOT gradient reduction over 12 months. Mean LVOT gradient decreased from 100.3 to 44.2 mmHg after ASA and from 85.7 to 18.4 mmHg with mavacamten at 12 months (both p<0.001). Between-group differences were not significant at 6 months, whereas residual LVOT gradient was lower with mavacamten at 12 months (p=0.004). NT-proBNP declined in both groups and was lower with mavacamten at both follow-up visits (both p<0.001). Third-degree atrioventricular block occurred more frequently after ASA (6.5% vs 0%, p=0.002). The composite endpoint occurred in 13 ASA- (12.1%) and 4 mavacamten-treated patients (3.5%) (p=0.003), with higher 1-year event-free survival in the mavacamten group (HR 0.19; 95%-CI 0.06-0.60; p=0.001). Conclusions: In this real-world comparative study, both ASA and mavacamten improved symptoms and LVOT obstruction in oHCM. Mavacamten was associated with a more favorable short-term hemodynamic and safety profile at 12 months.

Background: Bailout cardiac surgery during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is uncommon but remains associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Although registries have described its incidence and major causes, they often provide limited detail regarding device-related failure mechanisms, attempted transcatheter rescue, and the clinical pathway leading to surgical conversion. We aimed at analyzing post-marketing safety reports from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database to characterize the mechanisms, management strategies, and reported outcomes of bailout surgery during or shortly after TAVR. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed FDA MAUDE reports received from July 1, 2016, through June 30, 2026. Eligible reports described unplanned urgent or emergent open cardiac surgery during or immediately after TAVR. Candidate reports were screened, adjudicated, and deduplicated at the clinical-event level. Events were classified by precipitating complication, transcatheter rescue, operative pathway, and reported outcome. Associations were evaluated using permutation tests, Fisher exact tests with Benjamini?Hochberg correction, adjusted regression models, and sensitivity analyses. Results: After screening 43,239 initial reports, we identified 376 bailout-surgery events, with survival status was documented in 254, including 104 deaths and 150 survivors, corresponding to 40.9% reported mortality. Valve embolization, migration, or malposition was the most frequent complication phenotype (32.4%), whereas ventricular perforation or laceration was associated with the highest mortality (74.1%; OR, 4.86; 95% CI, 1.97?11.99). Mortality differed across complication phenotypes (p<0.001) and operative pathways (p<0.001), but not across transcatheter rescue pathways (p=0.355). Valve explantation with SAVR was associated with lower reported mortality (18.9%; OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.12?0.69), whereas unspecified surgery or access/support alone was associated with higher mortality (56.9%; OR, 3.04; 95% CI, 1.80?5.12). Ancillary analyses identified potential platform-specific differences in complication and management patterns, while bailout timing was not independently associated with mortality after adjustment. Conclusions: In this MAUDE analysis, bailout cardiac surgery after TAVR was most commonly precipitated by valve embolization, migration, or malposition, whereas ventricular perforation or laceration was associated with the highest reported mortality. Outcomes differed across complication and operative pathways but not across transcatheter rescue strategies or bailout timing after adjustment. These findings identify clinically relevant post-marketing safety signals but should not be interpreted as incidence estimates, comparative device risks, or causal treatment effects.

Background Exercise intolerance is common in adults with repaired tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF) despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF [&ge;]50%). Whether reduced exercise capacity is associated with early cardiac remodeling remains unclear. Objectives To determine whether reduced exercise capacity in rTOF with preserved LVEF is associated with diastolic dysfunction, atrial remodeling, right ventricular (RV) dysfunction, and myocardial fibrosis. Methods We retrospectively studied adults with rTOF and preserved LVEF who underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and/or cardiac MRI (CMR) within 18 months. Exercise capacity was assessed by percent-predicted peak VO2 (ppVO2). Diastolic function and atrial remodeling were evaluated by TTE, and CMR assessed RV function and myocardial fibrosis. Results Reduced exercise capacity was associated with larger left atrial volume index (LAVI; p < 0.001), elevated E/e' and reduced e' velocity (both p < 0.05), and reduced RV systolic function (p < 0.001). LAVI correlated inversely with ppVO2 ({rho} = -0.27, p = 0.003). A composite diastolic dysfunction score showed a graded relationship with exercise capacity, with patients exhibiting [&ge;]2 abnormalities having lower ppVO2 than those with [&le;]1 abnormality (both p < 0.01). In contrast, pulmonary regurgitation (PR) severity and myocardial fibrosis by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) were not associated with exercise capacity. Conclusions In adults with rTOF and preserved LVEF, reduced exercise capacity is associated with atrial remodeling, diastolic dysfunction, and RV dysfunction despite the absence of overt myocardial fibrosis. This suggests that multimodal imaging identifies an imaging-defined cardiac remodeling phenotype associated with early functional impairment.

Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with declines in physical function. While physical activity is linked to better physical function in the general population, its long-term impact in people with AF remains unclear. Investigating this relationship could provide insights and inform interventions for this population. Methods 624 participants with AF from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) cohort assessed in 2011-2013 were studied. Physical activity was assessed using the modified Baecke Physical Activity Questionnaire. Physical function was measured using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), grip strength, and 4-meter walk time up to 3 times over an 8-year period, with 4-meter walk speed as a secondary outcome evaluated in supplemental analyses. Confounder-adjusted linear mixed models were used to assess associations between physical activity and change in physical function trajectories over time. Results Participants had a mean age of 78.5 {+/-} 5.4 years, with 52.6% males and 13.8% Black. Median follow-up was 6.6 years. At baseline, greater sport-related leisure time, non-sport leisure time, and total moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) were cross-sectionally associated with better physical function. However, physical activity measures were not significantly associated with temporal trajectories in physical function over time. Conclusions In participants with AF, greater habitual physical activity was significantly associated with better baseline physical function but not with future trajectories. Randomized trials are needed to examine whether interventions that improve habitual physical activity or MVPA can improve physical functioning in individuals with AF.

BACKGROUND: Increased left ventricular mass (LVM) at a single time point after heart transplantation (HT) predicts future adverse outcomes. However, dynamic changes in LVM could have better biological relevance and reflect adverse graft remodeling (AGR). The prognostic significance of such serial changes has not been studied. METHODS: Using an automated, electronic health record-based institutional data infrastructure, we studied 439 HT recipients with 5,563 LVM measurements. Separate Bayesian joint models estimated the simultaneous associations of current LVM and its instantaneous rate of change with graft dysfunction (GD) and mortality. A joint-model-derived remodeling score combining patient-specific deviations in LVM and slope was dichotomized to define AGR and non-AGR groups. A mixed-effects analysis of all clinical variables was performed to assess associations with LVM both between and within patients. An independent cohort of 35 patients with 79 surveillance-biopsy RNA-sequencing samples was used to examine early stress-responsive pathways associated with the remodeling score. RESULTS: LVM declined by approximately 7 g/year after transplantation, with regression attenuating over time. Sixty patients (13.7%) had GD, and 75 (17.1%) died. Higher LVM was associated with subsequent GD (hazard ratio [HR] per 10 g, 1.14; 95% credible interval [CrI], 1.02-1.28) and mortality (HR, 1.10; 95% CrI, 1.02-1.19). A more positive LVM slope was associated with GD (HR per 1 g/year, 1.21; 95% CrI, 1.06-1.42) and with cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) grade 2 or 3 (HR, 1.39; 95% Crl, 1.02-1.96). LVM regressed more slowly in the AGR group (-5.8 vs -8.4 g/year), with higher GD (21.0% vs 6.4%) and mortality (24.2% vs 10.0%). Time-updated GD was associated with subsequent death (HR, 8.12; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 4.67-14.14). Transcriptomic analysis showed enrichment of interferon-mediated signaling and vascular endothelial activation with higher remodeling scores, whereas lower scores were associated with mitochondrial and metabolic processes, ribosome biogenesis, and pathways related to tissue repair and stress responses. CONCLUSIONS: AGR is an easily accessible imaging biomarker that reflects the changes in the allograft in response to various stressors and predicts future adverse outcomes. Discovery of molecular mechanisms of AGR could lead to novel therapies to protect the allograft from chronic rejection.

Background: Early defibrillation is a key factor of survival following out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). In the United Kingdom, initial anterior lateral (AL) defibrillator pad placement is standard practice. However, anterior posterior (AP) pad positioning has been proposed as a method of improving current flow through the myocardium particularly in cases of refractory ventricular fibrillation (VF). Concerns remain regarding potential delays to defibrillation associated with alternative pad placement strategies and the practical application of AP positioning. Objective: We conducted two consecutive simulation studies to explore whether there is a difference in the time taken to apply defibrillator pads, and placement accuracy, between AP and AL positions during simulated OHCA. Methods: This research study comprised of two simulation studies. First, we evaluated pad placement accuracy before and after written instruction showing optimal pad placement (RESTART SIM accuracy). Second, we undertook a randomised crossover examining time to pad placement, timing to successful pad application was recorded for each attempt (RESTART SIM speed). Results: RESTART SIM (accuracy) out of 14 participants 50% correctly placed AL pads and 14% correctly placed AP pads initially. Following provision of guidance this increased to 93% for AL but remained at 14% for AP placement. 9 participants completed RESTART SIM (speed). Mean AP pad placement time was 14.2 seconds and standard deviation of 2.64, compared with 10.6 seconds for AL placement and a standard deviation of 4.24. AP first strategy mean placement time was 15.3 seconds and mean AL placement time was 11.5 seconds. In AL first mean AP placement time was 12.8 seconds and mean AL placement time was 9.6 seconds. Conclusion: AP pad placement whilst slower than AL placement the time difference of 4 seconds is unlikely to be clinically significant. However, without guidance, both AL and AP placements were often inaccurate. After a guidance picture AL placement was increased but AP remained poorly placed.

Contemporary national-scale electronic health record (EHR) trends in documented acute myocardial infarction (AMI) rates during the high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) and Type 2 myocardial infarction (T2MI) era are not well characterized. We conducted a serial cross-sectional analysis of U.S. adults aged 18 years in Epic Cosmos from 2016-2024, encompassing 821,859,867 patient-years. Age- and sex-standardized AMI diagnosis rates increased 75.7%, from 343.1 to 602.7 per 100,000 patients. This increase was predominantly driven by T2MI, which increased 133.8% from 99.9 per 100,000 in 2018 to 233.4 per 100,000 in 2024; NSTEMI increased 13.8% while STEMI decreased 4.1%. Annual hs-cTn-tested encounters increased 34.5-fold from 2017 through 2024. The proportion of tested encounters associated with any AMI remained relatively stable after 2021, whereas T2MI continued to increase and surpassed NSTEMI in 2024 as the most frequently diagnosed AMI subtype per hs-cTn-tested encounters. Males had higher absolute AMI rates across all age groups, although relative increases were greater among females. Documented AMI epidemiology shifted substantially toward T2MI during expanding hs-cTn utilization, underscoring the need for evidence-based approaches to the evaluation and management of T2MI.

Background Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) T1 and T2 mapping accurately detect acute heart transplant rejection, but the diagnostic value of CMR-derived strain imaging remains uncertain, particularly for right ventricular strain. Data incorporating donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) into a composite reference standard are limited. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of CMR-derived left and right ventricular strain and ejection fraction for detecting acute rejection in pediatric and adult heart transplant recipients. Methods Blinded analysis of 1.5T CMR studies was performed in pediatric and adult heart transplant recipients 1-24 months post-transplant, as well as during five additional episodes of acute rejection occurring 3-14 years post-transplant. Left and right ventricular strain and ejection fraction were quantified using semi-automated post-processing. Acute rejection was defined using a composite reference standard comprising endomyocardial biopsy (EMB), clinical assessment, and dd-cfDNA. Diagnostic performance was assessed using cut-off values derived from receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results Among 214 CMR studies in 58 patients, 13 cases of acute rejection were identified. Diagnostic performance for detecting acute rejection was moderate for pediatric right ventricular longitudinal strain (AUC 0.782, 95% CI 0.565-0.999), whereas all other cardiac functional parameters demonstrated limited discrimination in both pediatric and adult patients (AUC 0.536-0.739). Models based on individual rejection indicators (EMB, clinical assessment, and dd-cfDNA) also showed poor diagnostic accuracy. Conclusion CMR-derived left and right ventricular strain and ejection fraction demonstrated limited ability to independently detect acute rejection. However, strain abnormalities, particularly RVLS in pediatric patients, may reflect downstream functional effects in more advanced rejection and may complement T1 and T2 mapping in assessing rejection severity.

Background: Preoperative risk assessment in vascular surgery relies on clinical scores and lipids that do not capture atherosclerotic disease activity. Circulating fatty acid synthase (cFAS) is a liver-derived enzyme whose concentration correlates with arterial plaque FAS content independent of LDL. The 5-item modified frailty index (mFI-5) is a validated predictor of postoperative mortality. Whether cFAS predicts outcomes after vascular surgery, and whether combining it with the mFI-5 improves risk discrimination, have not been examined. Methods: We studied 657 patients undergoing elective vascular surgery at a single center (2014 to 2023). cFAS was classified as non-detectable (n = 306) or, among detectable values, by tertiles (n = 117 each). Multivariable Cox models assessed associations with major adverse events (MAE), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), major adverse limb events (MALE), reintervention, and mortality, and Harrell's C-statistic quantified the incremental discrimination gained by adding cFAS and the mFI-5 to standard clinical covariates. Results: High serum cFAS was independently associated with 5-year MAE (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.94; 95% CI 1.31- 2.85), mortality (aHR 1.77; 1.05 to 3.00), MALE (aHR 4.53; 2.04 to 10.05), and reintervention (aHR 2.50; 1.37 to 4.57), but not MACE. Severe frailty (mFI-5 of 3 or higher) was associated with MACE (aHR 2.69; 1.29 to 5.58) and MAE (aHR 2.46; 1.30 to 4.65) but not limb endpoints at 1 year. Adding cFAS raised the 1-year MALE C-statistic from 0.649 to 0.764; the combined model yielded the highest discrimination. Conclusions: cFAS and mFI-5 were independently and additively associated with adverse outcomes after elective vascular surgery. cFAS was associated with limb events and mortality, the mFI-5 with cardiovascular events. Combining them improved discrimination over standard covariates.

Background: Adults aged [&ge;]75 years represent a rapidly growing population at risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), yet they remain markedly underrepresented in statin trials for primary prevention. The limited evidence base, together with multimorbidity, functional heterogeneity, and competing mortality risks, has contributed to uncertainty regarding the potential role of statins in very old adults. This study evaluated the association between baseline statin exposure and incident AMI among community-dwelling adults aged [&ge;]75 years without prior cardiovascular disease. Methods: We conducted a retrospective population-based cohort study using linked primary-care, hospital, laboratory, and pharmacy dispensing data from the Community of Madrid. Statin exposure was ascertained during a 24-month exposure-assessment period from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2019 and classified at a landmark date of 1 January 2020, when outcome follow-up began. Participants were classified as exposed if they had received at least two statin dispensations during the exposure-assessment period and had no record of prior lipid-lowering therapy before 2018. Individuals with prior cardiovascular disease, type 1 diabetes, cancer, dementia, or advanced chronic kidney disease were excluded. Missing data were addressed using multiple imputation. The association between baseline statin exposure and incident AMI was estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. Propensity-score matching and Fine-Gray competing-risk regression, with all-cause mortality as the competing event, were performed as sensitivity analyses. Results: Among 174,014 individuals included in the final cohort, 32,698 (18.8%) met the criteria for baseline statin exposure. The mean age was 82.5 years. During a median follow-up of 5 years, AMI occurred in 533 (1.63%) statin-exposed individuals and 2722 (1.93%) non-exposed individuals (p=0.0003). The observed absolute risk difference was 0.30 percentage points (95% CI, 0.14-0.45), corresponding to an estimated observational number needed to treat of 338 over 5 years (95% CI, 222-708). In the fully adjusted Cox model, baseline statin exposure was associated with a lower risk of incident AMI (HR, 0.805; 95% CI, 0.731-0.887). In the full-cohort Fine-Gray model accounting for competing mortality, baseline statin exposure remained associated with a lower cumulative incidence of AMI (sHR, 0.823; 95% CI, 0.748-0.905). After propensity-score matching, the association remained in the competing-risk analysis (subdistribution HR, 0.852; 95% CI, 0.738-0.983). Conclusions: In this large population-based cohort of adults aged [&ge;]75 years without prior cardiovascular disease, baseline statin exposure was associated with a lower incidence of AMI across several analytical approaches. The observed absolute risk difference was modest, and the findings should be interpreted in light of the observational design, residual confounding, and the potential for selection related to survival to the landmark date. Further randomized evidence is needed to determine whether this association reflects a causal effect of statin therapy in very old adults. Keywords: Statins; primary prevention; acute myocardial infarction; aged [&ge;]75 years; landmark analysis; competing risks; propensity-score matching; real-world data.